Course-Embedded Internship Summary and Validation Report
|
|||||
Directions:
This report should summarize all Course-Embedded Internship Activities that
have been recorded in the log forms. You will submit this completed form in your
12th course.
• The
Internship requires a minimum of 150 course-embedded hours.
Name: Shanaya Kuykendahl
Total Hours: 150
|
|||||
State Competency Standard
|
Course Number
|
Date Completed (Required)
|
Time Spent on Activity
|
Description of Activity
|
Reflection (150 words or less
describing what you learned from this activity) (Required)
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5311
Fundamentals of Leadership
|
11/6/2011
|
7 hrs
|
Students will collaborate with the school supervisor and develop the
18 month internship plan. Plans will
be based on self-assessment findings, professional goals, and the unique
needs of the intern and school.
|
In EDLD 5311 I met with my school supervisor and made out an 18 month
internship plan. It included many administrative duties that consist of
master scheduling, after school tutoring, budgeting and more. Initally we spoke about all of the possible
duties of an administrative and what things are a part of my professional
goals. From there we outlined a
internship plan that was best for me and the campus.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5311
Fundamentals of Leadership
|
11/6/2011
|
8 hrs
|
Students develop an educational vita noting all professional experience,
education, relevant training, professional organizations, and
references. The vita will become part
of the professional portfolio and used to note strengths and areas for
further development in devising the internship plan.
|
In this course, we had to develop an educational vita. I did not know there was a difference
between a resume and a vitae. As I
worked on my vita I realized I had more work to do. My vita was very short versus my
peers. I learned that my vita would
grow as I complete the master’s program and other endeavors along the
way.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5301
Research
|
12/18/2011
|
10 hrs
|
Students engage in identifying an action research topic(s) or
research question(s) and designing a draft action plan completing a
recommended template or format of a blueprint of the action research plan.
|
In EDLD 5301 I learned how action
research is a powerful tool to find solutions and improve every day practice
of a principal and the campus as a whole. I also learned that everyday issues
can become a topic for action research. I thought about several issues that I
have witnessed over the years and came up with several questions to decide on
what I would want to do for my action research project.
|
EDLD 5301
|
12/18/2011
|
5 hrs
|
Students review comments from colleagues and site supervisors and
engage in revising their draft action research plan. By the end of Week 5,
students should confer with their site supervisor(s) and agree on an action
research topic and plan.
|
I decided to work on parental
involvement as my action research project. Finally, with the help of my
campus supervisor and colleagues, I
decided to do an action research plan on
parental involvement on my campus.
Researching this information initially provided a plethora of information
that could be used for the information so I had to narrow the information
down to increasing parental involvement and parental support on intermediate
campuses. Often people confuse parental involvement and parental support. Both types of parental participation is
beneficial but it is important to know the difference and when to need or
request each of them. Overall I am excited about implementing the action research project plan. Ultimately I wish that
|
|
I.1
|
EDLD 5333
Leadership for Accountability
|
6/17/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students create a personal vision of leadership.
|
A vision is an image of what a
school can and should become. It is deeply embedded in values, hopes and
dreams. It should include input and discussion from all of the major
stakeholders in the school community (Peterson, 1995). My personal vision of
leadership states that to become a leader that motivates and empowers the
staff and students to accomplish their goals and focus on student
achievement. Schools should teach all
students critical thinking and problem solving. A good school is one that where the
principal, staff, and students work collectively to promote achievement,
focus on learning and communicates with the community. The principal has the responsibility in the
development and communication of the shared vision (Jones & Crochet,
2007). A good principal is one who is
an effective leader by promoting a positive learning environment for students
and staff, and is sensitive towards the need of faculty, students and
community.
My campus is
clear on what is the vision. Overall
the stakeholders all work together to stay focused on the vision regardless
of personal feelings. Obtaining the
vision is an ongoing process that our campus has to continually strive to
meet.
|
I.3
|
EDLD 5333
Leadership for Accountability
|
6/17/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students attend a Site-Based Decision-Making (SBDM) meeting, record
reflections, and interview the principal and one other staff member regarding
collaboration, consensus building strategies, ethical relationships, typical
agenda items, etc.
|
During week 5 assignment, I
recorded my experience at the Site Based Decision Making meeting where I
interviewed a SBDM member and the principal.
Our Site Based Decision Making committee is made up of teachers from
every department, administrators, parents and other stakeholders. The level of the SBDM committee authority
and power is often limited by the amount of control that the building
principal is willing to grant to the committee. At our campus, SBDM committee
recommendations are often passively-aggressively circumvented. The campus principal often feels that all
of the members of the Site Based Decision Making committee fail to understand
or lack the appropriate training in education to appreciate all the needs of
the school. She feels even though there
is a SBDM committee she will ultimately be held accountable for the overall
decisions so that is the reason for her need to have some control.
|
II.7
|
EDLD 5333
Leadership for Accountability
|
6/17/2012
|
5hrs
|
Students demonstrate leadership for accountability by researching
best practices, including specific professional development to address a
target area and list the strategies and rationale for using each strategy.
|
As a campus
principal, it is important to lead your staff to successfully improving data
by researching current methods that have been proven to work and start to
implement them. Professional
developments are always essential to getting your teachers prepared and ready
for any changes to assist with campus improvement.
My campus has identified the Hispanic subgroup being the area of
weakness. With my campus action plan
I suggested the school provide after-school tutorials for students at risk of
failure on Wednesdays and Thursdays 4:30pm -5:30pm at Saturday school 8:00am
-12:00pm. The formal evaluation to
test this strategy is to improve students at risk or in danger of failing
overall achievement through tests, benchmarks, STAAR or other assessments.
Another strategy I suggested for my camps action plan is to include campus wide professional development in
differentiated instructional strategies and skills specialists to use
campus-based best practices to guide differentiated instruction, planning,
training and implementation.
This is to aide teachers in instructional decision making,
interpreting and responding to students’ successes or failures, adjusting any
areas of weakness to promote student achievement.
|
III.8
|
EDLD 5333
Leadership for Accountability
|
6/17/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students conduct a data-based needs assessment. Based on the areas of
need identified, students create a campus action plan to address the needs
identified including professional development plans, allocation of resources
to support the plan, and any tools needed for school improvement efforts
|
During the week 4 assignment I analyzed my campus AEIS
and AYP report. I identified that our
weakest area was the Hispanic subgroup and Economically Disadvantaged. For the campus action plan I suggested that
my campus use after school tutoring, Saturday school and extra professional
development to enhance differential instruction. The strategies suggested for my campus
action plan had a $6000 budget. The
cost for after school calculated to $2038 for materials and $1800 total for
Saturday school. The cost for 4 days
of professional development was budgeted at $2000 for the school year.
To monitor the progress of the strategies the Campus
Improvement Committee will meet each month to evaluate the progress. The
stakeholders involved in this committee include the principal, associate
principal, parents, community members, business representative and elected
members of teaching staff from the school. THE CIP will analyze the data to provide feedback of the success of after school
tutoring, professional development, and spring semester Saturday school
tutorials. We will review the data and the impacts from the strategies
as well as the change they have made over the year.
|
II.4
|
EDLD 5333- Leadership for Accountability
|
6/17/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students conduct a data-driven, comprehensive needs assessment using
the latest AYP and AEIS data, a multi-year history of this data, and a
comparable improvement report.
|
AYP and AEIS
data play a big role in helping schools determine areas of weakness. By
looking at the data, principals can analyze trends, relationships, and
barriers. Once the data has been
reviewed, campus improvement goals should be created. The goals should follow
S.M.A.R.T. - specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely. Principals can analyze the data and focus
on areas of weakness and guide the way to campus improvement by conducting
meetings that allow staff to participate in the goal creating process and
lead them to a better understanding of what needs to happen to ensure
improvement.
In this week’s assignment, I reviewed my campus’s AEIS
report. My campus achieved an Academically
Acceptable rating for 2011. My campus
is mostly Hispanics and Economically Disadvantaged and these are the two
categories that we scored the lowest in as compared to the other
subgroups. As a campus we took at
decrease in every category and sub category from 2010 to 2011 causing our
rating to drop from Recognized to Academically Acceptable. On a positive note, my campus received Gold
Performance Acknowledgements for Attendance.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5344
School Law
|
4/1/2012
|
15 hrs
|
Application of learning by designing a remediation to a situation you
would like to improve in your school. In your School-Based Analysis, you
familiarized yourself with special education policies in your state and
school district. For your Application, you will use this knowledge as you follow
a fictional student, Joseph, who has just enrolled at your school. You will
develop an Individualized Education Program for “Julia,” monitor how her
program is implemented in the classroom, and use your knowledge of student
rights and school management to make sound decisions when she engages in
behavior that calls for disciplinary action. This assignment will require you
to use knowledge gained from your lectures and readings, and from
communication with leaders at your school, including your principal, special
education coordinator, and classroom teachers. Your final step will be to
make suggestions about how management policies and procedures for special
education students at your school can be improved. In all instances, you are
expected to cite relevant law and/or policy that you used to formulate your
answers.
|
In EDLD 5344 we worked with Joseph,
, a fictional middle school student enrolled at your school who requires an
Individualized Education Program. I developed an IEP and monitored how his
program is implemented in the classroom. He qualified for special education
services based on previous assessments which should have been completed within
the past three years. Due to the fact
that he is a transfer student his new placement will review the previous
district’s assessment and decide to either accept the previous district’s
assessment and the resulting diagnosis or conduct their own assessment. The assessment and the previous IEP
documentation generally covers needed related services. However, if a member
of the ARD committee deems that additional related services is needed the ARD
committee to make a recommendation for a referral for the related services to
determine if it is needed. I also
monitored how the program is implemented in the classroom, and used my
knowledge of student rights and school management to make sound decisions
when the student engaged in behavior that calls for disciplinary action.
|
I.3
|
EDLD 5345
Human Resource Mgt
|
5/6/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students review Chapter 247 of the Texas Administrative Code,
"Educators' Code of Ethics," conduct observations and/or interviews
in your school, and use the results of those observations interviews to
complete the "Code of Ethics Mind walk."
|
In EDLD 5345, we learned about the Code of Ethics for teachers. It is important that as teachers we exhibit
good ethic behavior for students as we expect them to display good
behavior. In this course we answered
questions with the “Code of Ethic Mind Walk”
to question our own ethics as educators. It gave you a view Ethics are an important
issues with educators and administrators to have their own personal ethics
especially ones that meet all legal issues.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5345
Human Resource Mgt
|
5/6/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students conduct an interview with an administrator at their school
regarding strategies for recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers and
administrators.
|
In EDLD 5345, I conducted an interview with my assistant principal
regarding strategies for recruiting and retaining high quality teachers and
administrators. The school that I’m currently working at has
a yearly job fair for qualified applicants and is also one of the highest paying
districts. We look for the best of the
best.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5345
Human Resource Mgt
|
5/6/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students access the policies and procedures in place in their
district related to teacher mentoring programs by accessing the district's
webpage or contacting district Human Resources Office and reflect on the
policies in place for mentoring induction.
|
The school district has a set mentoring program where every new
teacher with has a mentor and then that teacher is also part of a district
wide in-service for three years at their school with all other new
teachers. The district also has a
program for teachers new to the district, but not new to teaching called the
buddy system. When a teacher is new to
the district they have a buddy teacher and are part of a district wide
training program for 2 years. Both
programs meet about 4 times a year to discuss any issues that the teachers
are currently having. On my campus the teachers meet every week to discuss
concerns and accomplishments.
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5345
Human Resource Mgt
|
5/6/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students complete the Cultural Proficiency Receptivity Scale, use the
Cultural Proficiency Professional Development Rubric to assess the level of
professional development at their campus or workplace, and identify and
describe where and how their campus has responded to each of the elements of
Cultural Proficiency
|
In this course, the Cultural Proficiency Receptive Scale displayed
the effectiveness of dealing with diversity on the campus. Every year our campus starts the school
year off with a diversity professional development. This development helps teachers learn how to
deal with the diverse students that attend my campus. Teachers also commit to providing a
diversified campus to relate to the student population.
|
I.2
|
EDLD 5326 School Community Relations
|
2/12/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students develop a plan for a family-school-community partnership(s)
to increase student achievement
|
Developing a plan for a
family-school-community partnership adheres to the same guidelines used to
develop a Campus Improvement Plan. The
goal was to increase student achievement.
The first step to developing successful partnerships with the
community is providing training for school personnel who address working
collaborately with parents and community members. My plan consists of having a parental
involvement committee that connected parents, teachers, and the community to
work together to get more involved in students’ activities, education, and
achievement. After assessing the needs
of my school, I felt that this would enhance student achievement. As a school leader, establishing a school
climate that welcomes all education stakeholders regardless of their cultural
or economic differences will result increased parent and community
involvement. Most importantly, all
stakeholders should be treated as valuable members of the partnership. Overall, I feel the project that I
developed would be very beneficial to my school in assisting with student
achievement.
|
I.2
|
EDLD 5326 School Community Relations
|
2/12/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students develop a presentation to be given to key stakeholders in
their school that emphasizes the importance of parental-community involvement
to student achievement.
|
In EDLD 5326, I learned that identifying
key stakeholders is crucial in the success of implementing new initiatives on
a campus. The stakeholders in my family-school-community partnership are the
campus principal, community members, parents, staff members, and students. As
a leader, I would invite my identified stakeholders to attend a presentation
on effective implementation on an effective parental involvement committee.
My goal would be to increase student achievement through parent
involvement. Therefore, I would make
sure all stakeholders were aware of the benefits of having a parental
involvement committee. Working together collaboratively
with parents, teachers, and the community will increase student achievement
overall.
|
I.1
|
EDLD 5339
Organization and Mgt Issues
|
10/3/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students interview two school leaders regarding campus organization
and management and Site-Based Decision-Making (SBDM) policies and procedures,
which include issues of campus vision and mission.
|
In EDLD 5339, I interviewed two assistant principals
at two different campuses on organization
and management and Site-Based Decision-Making (SBDM) policies and
procedures. One administrator, Dr.
Stewart was from the intermediate level while Ms. Brown was from the middle
school level. As many things were the
same there were also some differences that were visible on the two
campuses.
|
III.9
|
EDLD 5339
Organization and Mgt Issues
|
10/3/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students analyze the scheduling process in place on the campus and
weigh the effects of the schedule on campus goals, objectives, and student
needs.
|
Dr. C.B. Stewart was interviewed at the intermediate level while Mrs.
Brown is at the middle school level.
In the area of master schedule management, Dr. Stewart differs with
his goals when preparing the master’s schedule by stating that they
incorporate behaviors, lunch schedules and bus routes in creating the master
schedule. Another difference identified
was that the intermediate level uses a spreadsheet to complete the master
schedule by hand while the middle school uses a computer software, SMS, to
create the master schedule. . Both
assistant principals noted that the main purpose of the master schedule is to
make effective use of time, staff, students, and instructional time. In addition, at both school levels the
master schedules are created at the end of the previous school year and
completed a month before school starts.
|
III.9
|
EDLD 5339
Organization and Mgt Issues
|
10/3/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students analyze campus goals and objectives and the use of resources
such as time and personnel to address the issues of a safe and productive
school environment.
|
In the management of facilities area, Dr. Stewart and Mrs. Brown had
very little differences. Mrs. Brown
states that the following district level departments provide support for
facility management: Building and Properties, Career and Technical Education,
Central Receiving, Child Nutrition, Facilities Planning and Construction,
Health Services, Maintenance, Police, Purchasing, Risk Management, Safe and
|
II.6
|
EDLD 5388 Diverse Learners
|
11/14/2012
|
6 hrs
|
Students conduct a teacher quality survey which looks at factors such
as the years of teaching experience of campus teachers, degrees held
(bachelor or master), teacher ethnicity, compared with ethnicity of students
and community demographics and prepare a report of their findings.
|
In EDLD 5388, I conducted a teacher quality survey at my school where
I administered a 6 question survey to the teachers. The teachers were surveyed about their
gender, race, years of teaching experience, certifications, level of
education, and teaching assignments.
The data was collected and analyzed along with teacher turnover rate
on the school’s AEIS report. During
this analysis, I also indentified if the teachers were highly qualified to
teach in their current teaching assignment and whether there is equity among
programs with respect to highly qualified teachers.
|
II.7
|
EDLD 5388 Diverse Learners
|
11/14/2012
|
5 hrs
|
Students discuss state and federal legal requirements for
Response-to-Intervention (RTI) policy and make application of RTI through a
case study process
|
This course focused on diverse learners using diversified instruction
to accommodate the students’ academic needs.
The RTI process is something that we started on my campus a couple of
years ago so I was familiar with the subject but it was interesting to learn
about the state and federal legal requirements instead of the routine
procedures. In the course we use a
case study to apply the RTI process.
The activity was very similar to how we operate the RTI program on my
campus.
|
I.1
|
EDLD 5352 Instructional Leadership
|
2/18/2013
|
6 hrs
|
In this
School-Based Application, the student will look at the strengths and
weaknesses of your campus as you examine and apply data from the Texas Campus
STaR Chart, a technology data-gathering tool provided by the state. You will
complete a three-year comparison of Texas Campus STaR Chart data from your
campus with statewide summary data. Like the resources you utilized in your
Analysis assignment, the STaR chart will prove useful as you become an
instructional leader.
|
In EDLD 5352, we analyzed data from the Texas Campus STaR Chart. It is a technology data gathering tool
provided by the state. It is an online resource tool for self-assessment of
your campus’ and district’s efforts to effectively integrate technology
across the curriculum. I found that my campus is moderate with their use of
technology across the curriculum but it is definitely room for
improvement. It is important to stay
current in the forever changing world of technology.
|
II.4
|
EDLD 5335 Curriculum Mgt
|
12/23/12
|
5 hrs
|
Students
describe Curriculum Management Audit standards, compare the audit standards
to the campus curriculum program, and make suggestions for improvement of
academic performance through use of the audit the standards.
|
When a school goes thru a curriculum management audit it
will have the opportunity to evaluate every aspect of the school. Effective audits can serve as a valuable
tool of the process and system in place within a district. It is an opportunity to get outside
feedback. CMA can provide a district
with the data necessary to support the development of centralized processes
to support and improve district curriculum management practices and
procedures. It can also help point a
district in the right direction by directing the alignment of written
expectations and instructional practices, thereby increasing student
achievement and learning, the ultimate goal of schools. I would recommend that every campus conduct
a Curriculum Management Audit. The
objectivity required of such an audit allows districts and campus’ the
opportunity to see things in a new a different perspective. The audit process
brings the campus together for a common goal to help the students. There is always room for improvement.
|
II.5
|
EDLD 5335 Curriculum Mgt
|
12/23/12
|
5 hrs
|
Students use
set criteria to evaluate a teacher's edition of a textbook or a curriculum
guide for a content area or a campus objective selected for a
learner-centered staff development experience.
|
In this course, we completed the preliminary organization of the
learner-centered staff development session.
The session purpose was to understand the importance of and how to use
data driven decision making to create learner-centered objectives and lesson
plans so as to create differentiated lesson plans for targeted groups of
students. My learning objective to address
was to create a preliminary plan by each teacher using data driven decision
making to address targeted student needs.
|
II.4
|
EDLD 5335 Curriculum Mgt
|
12/23/12
|
4 hrs
|
Students
describe Curriculum Management Audit standards, compare the audit standards
to the campus curriculum program, and make suggestions for improvement of
academic performance through use of the audit the standards.
|
When a school goes thru a curriculum management audit it will have
the opportunity to evaluate every aspect of the school. Effective audits can serve as a valuable
tool of the process and system in place within a district. It is an opportunity to get outside
feedback. CMA can provide a district
with the data necessary to support the development of centralized processes
to support and improve district curriculum management practices and
procedures. It can also help point a
district in the right direction by directing the alignment of written
expectations and instructional practices, thereby increasing student
achievement and learning, the ultimate goal of schools. I
would recommended that every campus conduct a Curriculum Management
Audit. The objectivity required of
such an audit allows districts and campus’ the opportunity to see things in a
new a different perspective. The audit process brings the campus together for
a common goal to help the students.
There is always room for improvement.
|
II.5
|
EDLD 5335 Curriculum Mgt
|
12/23/12
|
4 hrs
|
Students use
set criteria to evaluate a teacher's edition of a textbook or a curriculum
guide for a content area or a campus objective selected for a
learner-centered staff development experience.
|
In this course, we completed the preliminary organization of the
learner-centered staff development session.
The session purpose was to understand the importance of and how to use
data driven decision making to create learner-centered objectives and lesson
plans so as to create differentiated lesson plans for targeted groups of
students. My learning objective to address
was to create a preliminary plan by each teacher using data driven decision
making to address targeted student needs.
|
Monday, March 25, 2013
EDLD 5398 -Week 1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment